science
Climate change: What is carbon sequestration and can it save our planet?
- Nidal Abu Murad
- BBC – World Service
Scientists say CO2 removal is inevitable if we are to save the planet
If the world is to avoid the ill effects of climate change, net greenhouse gas emissions must be close to zero by 2050, which means removing as much carbon from the atmosphere as we pay into the atmosphere. This is the opinion of leading United Nations scientists who have warned that we are heading for a two degree rise in global temperature, which could make life difficult for many parts of the planet.
Scientists say natural solutions, such as planting trees and technologies such as carbon capture and storage, will be key to avoiding the catastrophic effects of climate change. But for some environmentalists this is not the right way to go.
What is carbon capture and storage?
Natural solutions to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through simple and inexpensive ways to reduce carbon dioxide include planting carbon sequestration methods in the soil from planting trees.
Since the 1970s, new, faster technologies known as carbon storage technologies have emerged.
“There are many options, and it’s very common to capture carbon dioxide from fossil fuel – powered industrial sources. Energy Company.
The process involves injecting emissions into an absorption compound containing a solvent. Carbon dioxide collects and other gases are released.
Scientists use heat to separate solvents from carbon dioxide. The solvent is then recycled and the pure carbon dioxide is stored deep underground in rock caves.
“Another way to capture carbon dioxide is to remove it directly from the air,” he adds.
However, it is stored in deep geological systems to stay away from the carbon cycle that contributes to the warming of the planet. “
License to extract more oil
But some environmentalists are skeptical. They worry that the quicker solution is to focus on fossil fuel emissions instead of reducing carbon emissions.
In 2021, the Global Climate Organization, Global Witness, conducted research to assess whether technology would help achieve the 1.5 degree Celsius goal of preventing global warming.
Their conclusion is that “global emissions reductions cannot be trusted to be on schedule, but it can also be used to extract more oil,” said Dominic Eagleton, senior campaigner for Global Witness.
The film was released, Getty Images
Some environmentalists say investing in carbon capture technology slows the transition to renewables
In his opinion, “the best way to stop emissions is to stop burning fossil fuels.”
Piera Patrizio, a climate researcher at Imperial College London, says: “Some environmentalists believe that the money spent on increasing carbon sequestration should be used to accelerate the use of clean energy.
“But given the deadline we have, decarbonization is inevitable, and it’s unrealistic to think we do not need carbon storage technologies.”
The “inevitable solution” to achieving net zero
Scientists argue that CCS remains a key component of the transition to a world without fossil fuels, until we have access to large-scale renewable energy sources. They backed up their argument, citing the most recent IPCC document released earlier this month.
“For the first time in April, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommended the use of technology to eliminate carbon dioxide,” said Patricio.
The film was released, Getty Images
Planting trees is a natural way to capture carbon
Some solutions to reduce emissions in heavy industries such as steel, cement and chemicals suggest that emissions can only be reduced by advanced technologies such as carbon dioxide capture and storage.
“These processes often require high temperatures,” says Samantha McCallough of the International Energy Agency. “And a quarter of industrial emissions are caused by chemical reactions that cannot be avoided by switching to alternative fuels.”
Planting new forests or reclaiming old forests can be very beneficial to the environment. But according to Patricio, “some are not effective for a long time”.
“The tree’s ability to separate carbon is temporary because when it matures, it stops removing carbon until it protects the entire forest,” he explains.
“Technology removal methods avoid this problem,” he says. “With CCS, carbon dioxide is stored permanently in geo storage sites.”
CCS lawyers also point out that in some countries, investments in all forms of clean energy are not available. For those with high emissions of fossil fuels, carbon capture and storage may be necessary.
“We have locations where there are significant emissions from many sectors, such as refining, steel, cement, or energy.
Still modern and expensive
The film was released, Climbworks
Direct air capture technology removes carbon dioxide from the air and stores it underground
“The technology is still new, and our job is to create ventilators that remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it permanently on the ground,” said Christoph Butler, founder of ClimWorks, the first commercial plant to directly absorb carbon dioxide. Wind.
Unlike utilities directly linked to fossil fuel sources, ClimWorks filters the air around its plant.
“We’ve in Iceland but what we do affects CO2 levels everywhere.”
“CO2 capture and storage captures emissions before they enter the atmosphere. What we do captures what is already in the sky,” Bettler added.
Direct air capture is not controversial as it has no direct contact with pollutants.
According to ClimWorks, the facility is powered by renewable energy sources, making it a sustainable carbon capture solution.
But as with any emerging technology, it is not clear how effective it will be until it is widely disseminated.
For now, it is subject to speculation and there are questions about its feasibility and expansion potential.
“The main challenge of carbon capture technology is its cost,” says Samantha McCulloch. “Significant investment is needed not only in capture facilities, but also in planning and investing in CO2 transport and storage infrastructure. We have seen progress, but we are still in the early days.”
Ambitious road
The film was released, Getty Images
Proponents of CCS say the old carbon dioxide will remain in the atmosphere by 2030 or 2040, even if it upgrades our energy systems and reduces new emissions.
Experts point out that this is the historic carbon that needs to be pulled.
The discussion is also about priorities. Should we focus on renewables in the short term or should we invest more in capturing carbon first? Some believe the two should go hand in hand.
“Didn’t CCS green our planet anyway? The portrayal of those who support its use as rejecting biodiversity is not true, we really care,” said Patricio of Imperial College London.
McCulloch explains that the International Energy Agency’s latest analysis of carbon sequencing prioritizes an approach that considers “full-scale options to be used all at once.”
“Getting us on the path to net zero carbon by 2050 requires a promising change in how we use, transport and produce energy, which is why the world needs full-scale solutions that include renewables, energy efficiency, increased deployment of hydrogen technologies, and carbon sequestration. In this regard, it plays an important role.
“Award-winning beer geek. Extreme coffeeaholic. Introvert. Avid travel specialist. Hipster-friendly communicator.”
An international team led by researchers at the British Wellcome Sanger Institute has revealed a new drug target that could act as an alternative treatment for kidney cancer if doctors don’t recommend surgery. According to the results of a study published in the journal Nature Communications (Monday), this rare cancerous form of kidney tumor is called Renin tumor, and its complete genetic code has been understood for the first time.
Reninoma is one of the rarest cancers in humans, with only about 100 cases reported worldwide. Although it can usually be treated with surgery, it can cause severe high blood pressure and develop into malignant tumors that can spread.
There are still no medical treatments for kidney tumors, as treatment management only involves surgery. Before the results of the latest study came out, it was not known what genetic error caused these types of tumors.
According to the study’s co-principal investigator, Dr. Sam Bagadi, Wellcome Senior Research Fellow at the Wellcome Sanger Institute: “The significance of our results is that we have succeeded in discovering the essence of this type of tumor. Based on the fact that it is so rare, there have been no previous studies on it.
He added to Asharq Al-Awsat: “Not only have we been able to understand the genetic code of a kidney tumor, but we have also shown that drugs can counteract what triggers it, and this may be important for patients whose tumors cannot be removed. through surgery.”
Researchers have identified a specific error in the genetic code of a known cancer gene called NOTCH1, which is behind the development of this rare cancer.
“This is the first time we have identified the causes of kidney tumors, and we believe our work will continue to pave the way for new treatments,” said lead study author Taryn Trescher at the Wellcome Sanger Institute.
The team has already studied two cancer samples, one from a young adult and the other from a child, using advanced genetic techniques. Their findings suggest that existing drugs that actually target this gene could be used as a potential solution for treating kidney tumors in patients for whom surgery is not a viable option.
Dr Tansina Chowdhury, lead researcher on the study at Great Ormond Street Hospital in the UK, explained: “Rare forms of kidney cancer known as renal tumors do not respond to traditional anti-cancer treatments. “Currently the only known treatment is surgery.” She added: “There is a specific, well-known gene that drives this rare cancer. Our study shows that the studied gene has “If we use drugs that are already known to affect this gene, we can deal with it without the need for invasive medical technology like surgery.”
Here Bahjati said: “Rare cancers are a huge challenge for research and analysis. Patients with other types of tumors may not benefit from them. “But here is a powerful example of cutting-edge science that is changing our understanding of an extremely rare type of tumor: a discovery that could have immediate clinical benefits for patients.” He added: “We will continue to study these extremely rare tumors to understand their genetic code, which we hope will reveal more new therapeutic approaches.”
“Award-winning beer geek. Extreme coffeeaholic. Introvert. Avid travel specialist. Hipster-friendly communicator.”
science
Climate change: Saudi Arabia warns against rush to abandon traditional fuels – Financial Times
image source, Good pictures
We begin our tour of British newspapers with Amy Williams in New York and Miles McCormick in Calgary at the Financial Times on what they describe as deep tensions and divisions over the oil and gas industry’s role in combating climate change. Recent events in New York, US and Calgary, Canada this week cast doubt on the likelihood of an agreement at the upcoming United Nations COP28 conference.
According to the article, when world leaders and senior officials meet in New York in ten weeks ahead of the United Nations’ COP28 climate summit, there is a deep divide between those who support and those who urge the expansion of fossil fuel use. Stopping all forms of growth and expansion is critical to achieving stability in the world.
In December, the UN The authors quoted Dan Jorgensen, Denmark’s minister for development cooperation and global climate policy, who is leading discussions on new climate targets that could be agreed at the climate change conference COP28, as saying: “Countries agree that we must move. Move forward on this issue.” “But the bad news is that we’re far from reaching an agreement. We need to address the larger problem of burning fossil fuels.”
According to the article, tensions between the world’s nations related to the precise meaning of “phasing out” of fossil fuels and whether this would allow the expansion of carbon capture technologies, also known as mitigation, have failed climate summits. In subsequent years to reach an agreement.
The newspaper reported that French President Emmanuel Macron and Kenyan President William Rudo along with 17 other leaders signed a letter last week in which they stressed that “mitigation technology cannot be used to expand the use of fossil fuels”.
The article also reported that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU’s goal of “phasing out fossil fuels before 2050” would require major polluters to come on board.
As developing countries push to finance green energy systems, US climate envoy John Kerry has attacked new coal plant developments in Asia, where China and India are ramping up production. Meanwhile, oil company leaders gathered on the outskirts of Calgary, Alberta, the heart of Canada’s oil industry, for a very different conversation.
The Financial Times highlights how some 500 senior industry officials, including ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods, warned of the dangers of the rush away from fossil fuels at the World Petroleum Congress, a biennial oil and gas industry conference.
Amin Nasser, chief executive of Saudi Aramco, the world’s biggest oil producer, told the delegation, which included a large presence from Canada and Saudi Arabia: “I see many flaws in the current transitional approach. It’s ignored.”
“Premature cessation of conventional energy endangers energy security and affordability priorities, and as the recent energy crisis — exacerbated by the conflict in Ukraine — has shown, the world teeters if these realities are ignored,” al-Nasser’s speech said.
According to the authors, fossil fuel industry executives who are expected to attend will fight against production cuts before 2050 when world leaders head to the COP28 conference in December, hoping to reach an agreement to maintain the goal of limiting global warming.
“This is how Putin can be defeated.”
image source, Reuters
We return to the Telegraph newspaper, which published an article by Hamish de Breton-Gordon, in which the West called for the urgent delivery of attack weapons to Ukraine, emphasizing that NATO countries have the ability to crush the “tsar”, as he described it. It is.
The writer said that the West should provide Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with the necessary weapons, and in this way Russian President Vladimir Putin would be defeated.
In his article, the author sets a timetable of more than 12 months – at most – for Ukraine to defeat Russia, but he points out that a stalemate is felt in the air regarding Kiev’s armaments. The West faces the risk of losing ground, while Ukrainian tanks appear to be breaking through the defensive lines designed by former Russian general Sergei Churovykin. According to Gordon, they rushed towards Russia.
Author Gordon says that Poland’s suspension of arms supplies to Ukraine is a matter that will make headlines in Polish local newspapers ahead of next month’s elections, but is echoed in the international press as a sign of “Ukraine fatigue” and its impact on Poles.
The writer emphasized the importance of Polish engineering and logistical support to help the Ukrainian army and maintain its advance, but in the agricultural economy, unlike many industrialized countries in the West, Poland’s peasants had high reservations and feared the influx of cheap Ukrainian grain. In the European market, as a result of the Russian occupation, the grain issue and placing it at the center of the conflict.
Elections can lead politicians to adopt a course that is consistent with their electoral interests, and not necessarily a moral line, which applies to the United Kingdom and the United States, which will hold elections next year, and apply. Poland, according to the article.
The author says: “Western weapons are slowly changing the course of events in favor of Ukraine, but the pace of events was slow and very small, because it took six months to supply Ukraine with precision artillery, and 12 months to supply it with tanks, and two years to acquire F-16 fighter jets. Had all this happened in the first 12 months of the invasion, most analysts, myself included, would agree that the war would have been over, and politicians around the world would not have struggled with the moral question of whether to do the right thing. For themselves or for peace in Europe?
The writer adds that since Ukrainian artillery units are already trained on multi-barrel launchers, the West, and especially the US, could give a major boost to the Ukrainian offensive by deploying the Atacms long-range artillery system without delay. MRLS” was used to launch these precision missiles. Up to a range of 300 kilometers, it will give the Ukrainians the ability to destroy Russian artillery in Crimea, and help light and heavy military forces achieve victory this time.
Retaking Crimea, a territory important to both sides, would end the war, topple Putin and deprive Russia of a strong military that has helped threaten the West for nearly a decade, the writer concludes.
“Women should not be forced to justify men’s attacks.”
We conclude the newspaper description with an article published by the British Times by Jenny Russell entitled “Women should not be pushed to justify men’s assaults”.
The writer discussed what she described as women’s boredom with a reduced choice between “insulting men or risking their personal safety.”
In her essay, two friends stunned her by defending the much-talked-about public figure Crispin Odey, who faced accusations of sexually abusing women just days before reports of allegations against Russell Brand — allegations he vehemently denies. , allegations that Odi had previously vehemently denied.
The writer highlighted the opinions of two of his friends, one of whom said: “They know what they’re doing, if they don’t like it, they should have found another job,” the other said sarcastically: “Girls he went home! They know what it’s like.”
The author explains that the common assumptions underlying these ideas are repulsive and impose impossible odds on women.
In her article, Jenny Russell, women are expected to treat men whom they know as professionally and socially trustworthy, and to treat them with respect.
It is not permissible for a woman to publicly refuse to ride in an elevator with her colleague, or to decline her neighbor’s invitation to ride in his car, or to avoid a late-night coffee with her boyfriend. She fears sexual assault.
He explained that this creates an atmosphere of shame and anger for men, because women who say it openly are humiliated or fired, as it is seen as an accusation and suspicion of the opposite man’s intentions. Among them.
On the other hand, a woman who has been assaulted, many immediately view her behavior through a completely different lens. It is necessary for her to expect that any man may be a sex predator and she should be wary of him and take necessary precautions.
“What did she think she was doing when she was alone with a man at home, office or hotel? What did she expect?” There will be questions.
It’s an old and unforgiving view: women who trust men or are forced to do so are seen as complicit or guilty because weakness is reframed as consent.
The author says that the presence of these two contradictory behaviors of women at the same time is used by some predatory men to trap them, these men deliberately exploit the mystique of women. Avoiding traps while maintaining a social presence is what women try to do, but it is an exhausting or dangerous process.
In many fields, women have to make a tragic choice: either quit their jobs or accept harassment as the price of their lives, the author says.
“Award-winning beer geek. Extreme coffeeaholic. Introvert. Avid travel specialist. Hipster-friendly communicator.”
Breast cancer is a disease that affects women, especially with a high number of infections, but in fact it affects men as well, and many believe that it leads to death among them.
she explained NHS The NHS in England says that 85 men die each year in Britain from breast cancer, and that the malignancy affects around 400 men annually.
The charity Breast Cancer Now also reports that “at least one person is diagnosed with the disease every day”.
According to the website “Mayo ClinicMedically, male breast cancer is “a rare cancer that begins with the growth of cells in the breast tissue of men.”
Breast cancer cells disrupt the immune system
Australian researchers announced Monday that breast cancer cells have powerfully destroyed the body’s immune system, allowing the disease to invade patients’ bones.
“Breast cancer in men usually affects older people, but it can occur at any age,” he pointed out.
Those diagnosed with “male breast cancer” at an early stage have a good chance of recovery.
What are the symptoms?
The symptoms of this disease are as follows:
A painless lump or thickening of breast tissue and changes in the skin of the breast, such as sagging, wrinkling, redness or peeling.
Changes in the nipples, such as redness or peeling, or one of the nipples turning inward.
The causes of these malignant tumors are still unclear, but doctors define “male breast cancer” as occurring when “some breast cells divide faster than healthy cells.”
Accumulated cells form a tumor, which can spread (metastasize) to nearby tissues, lymph nodes, or other parts of the body.
According to the website “Web MedicineThe disease can be diagnosed through a clinical examination, which is done by feeling the chest area of the person in search of any tumors or changes in the chest tissue, and the doctor evaluates the size, structure and depth of the tumors present.
It can be diagnosed with radiographic imaging such as X-rays or ultrasound to create clear images of the breast tissue.
Only a biopsy is used to “confirm” a diagnosis of breast cancer in men. This is done by taking a sample of the tumor tissue and examining it to confirm whether the tumor is cancerous or benign.
Treatment usually involves surgery to remove as much of the visible tumor as possible, along with some of the surrounding healthy tissue.
Other treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be recommended depending on the condition.
“Award-winning beer geek. Extreme coffeeaholic. Introvert. Avid travel specialist. Hipster-friendly communicator.”
-
Top News1 year agoTop 3 Cities in Vietnam for Digital Nomads
-
Top News1 year agoReasons why there isn’t More Scoring in Soccer
-
Top News2 years agoDirection Dubai: Private jets were attacked to escape the health drama in India
-
Economy3 months ago
Apple’s market cap is about $3 trillion
-
science2 years agoA Scientific Surprise .. Contemporary Month of Ancient Egyptians | Science
-
Tech2 years agoThe email is said to have come from Nintendo’s Lost Game Boy extension
-
Tech2 years agoNetflix launches new video game platform on Android devices
-
entertainment2 weeks ago
“Hanging Gardens” represents Iraq in the competition for “Oscars”.
